betterMQvsHookdeck
A queue that pushes out vs a gateway that takes in
Hookdeck is a managed event gateway for inbound webhooks. betterMQ is a self-hosted queue that pushes your own jobs out, with scheduling built in.
choose bettermq when
- You need to enqueue and send your own async jobs, not manage inbound ones.
- You want cron and interval scheduling in the same tool.
- Self-hosting and avoiding per-event billing matter.
- One Rust binary beats a managed platform for your stack.
choose hookdeck when
- ›Your problem is ingesting webhooks from Stripe, Shopify, etc.
- ›You want a polished UI for inspecting, filtering and transforming events.
- ›Deep delivery observability and replay across teams is the priority.
- ›A fully managed, SOC2-style platform is required.
{ feature by feature }
betterMQ vs Hookdeck
| Capability | betterMQ | Hookdeck |
|---|---|---|
| Primary direction | Outbound jobs | Inbound events |
| Hosting model | Self-hosted | Managed |
| License | MIT / Apache | — |
| Push delivery + retries + DLQ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cron & interval scheduling | ✓ | — |
| Fan-out to many destinations | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rate / parallelism control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Inbound event inspection UI | Panel | Rich |
| Event transformations/filtering | — | ✓ |
| Pricing | Server cost | Per event |
| Data residency | Your infra | Hookdeck cloud |
They solve different halves of the problem
Hookdeck shines at the receiving side — capturing third-party webhooks with a deep console. betterMQ lives on the sending side — you enqueue your own work and it pushes it to your endpoints.
Where betterMQ pulls ahead
If your real need is an async job queue with cron, betterMQ does that natively, self-hosted, with no per-event meter.
Where Hookdeck pulls ahead
For taming inbound webhooks from many providers — with transformations, filtering and managed reliability — Hookdeck is purpose-built.
Need to push jobs, not catch them?
That's exactly what betterMQ is for — and you can run it in a minute.